This is probably ill advised, but 3
things crossed my path last month and I'm going to combine them into
one blog post. I finished Cheryl Strayed's "Wild", the
story of a woman who walked 1,000 miles of the Pacific Crest Trail. I
usually don't read books like that, but she grew up near here and I
wanted to know about this friend of my friends. Throughout, she
acknowledges the greatness of ordinary people she meets and ends with
"It
was my life - like all lives, mysterious and irrevocable and sacred."
Then, I saw a great post by Krista Tippet at OnBeing.org about a
woman who was recently killed in Syria. A woman doing perfectly
normal work who we now see as a hero. Then finally, Sam Harris talked
for a brief 25 minutes and covered everything that needs to be
covered about how we should listen to all the voices and not distort
them.
Maybe I should let Cheryl tell her own
story. Here she is at the end of the book, reflecting on the years
since her hike and what the hike meant to her.
“It was all unknown to me then, as I sat on that white bench on the day I finished my hike. Everything except the fact that I didn't have to know. That is was enough to trust that what I'd done was true. To understand its meaning without yet being able to say precisely what it was, like all those lines from The Dream of a Common Language that had run through my nights and days. To believe that I didn't need to reach with my bare hands anymore. To know that seeing the fish beneath the surface of the water was enough. That it was everything. It was my life - like all lives, mysterious and irrevocable and sacred. So very close, so very present, so very belonging to me. How wild it was, to let it be.”
We know
about Cheryl because she wrote a book and an already famous movie
star bought the rights. Oh, and Oprah liked it. But at the time of
her experience of the hike, she was just another one of us,
struggling to find her way. Millions of people we won't know are
doing that right now. We probably would not have never heard from
Kayla Mueller if she had not been kidnapped then killed while
volunteering in Syria. We would not have heard her words that are as
profound as any saint or mystic. Words she wrote while imprisoned by
terrorists.
I have been shown in darkness, light + have learned that even in prison, one can be free. I am grateful. I have come to see that there is good in every situation, sometimes we just have to look for it.”
Krista tells us more about her and also talks of the three Muslims that were killed by a man in Chapel Hill North Carolina, apparently after
arguing over a parking space. These three also were destined to do
great things. We may have never heard of them, but people in their
communities most certainly would have. See Krista's post for more
about them.
But
instead of them doing their good works, the person we will eventually
hear from is the killer. People are speculating now. They looked at
the killers Facebook page and found many posts about atheist writers,
and have suggested this was a hate crime. By extension, some
journalists have sad those atheist writers have blood on their hands.
So we are having that conversation instead. Instead of building the
world we want, we are arguing about motivations for violence and
trying to assign blame.
It is obvious that some instances of Muslim violence have nothing whatsoever to do with Islam, and I would never dream of assigning blame to the religion of Islam for that behavior. …
What
we've built over the past few centuries is a world where we can
discuss our beliefs and our aspirations openly. We've built a world
where normal everyday people can accomplish amazing things in their
spare time. But enough people want to return to a 7th
century world or 1st century world, that the rest of us
have to deal with them. As Sam says,
...there’s nothing about doubting that the universe has a creator, that suggests that violence in certain circumstances is necessary or even acceptable. And all the people who are comparing these murders to Charlie Hebdo – or to ISIS, as insane as that sounds – are really trivializing a kind of violence that threatens to destabilize much of the world.
If
you listen to the audio from Sam, he plays the sound of gunfire that
came into a meeting in Denmark where people were simply discussing
the Charlie Hebdo murders. A woman is speaking about peace and free
speech, then several shots are fired, chairs and desks can be heard
scuffling across the floor and something like a pipe falling. It's
disturbing, and I'm not easily disturbed. It's probably because it is
real and it is in the present. Sam follows that with, "is this
the world we want?"
Earlier
in the talk, he talks of the differences in the types of violence we
are seeing today and how we must be able to distinguish them and to
speak out against the types that are dangerous. "The thing that
very few people seem able to distinguish, and the distinction
that Greenwald and Aslan obfuscate at every opportunity, is the
difference between criticizing ideas and their results in the world,
and hating people as people because they belong to a certain group,
or because they have a certain skin color, or because they came from
a certain country. There is no connection between those two
orientations. The
latter is of course bigotry and I would condemn it as harshly as
anyone would hope."
We
need to be able to criticize bad ideas and
to recognize people quietly doing great things and not be afraid that
pointing out either of those will somehow upset someone or lead them
to violence.
Cheryl
ends her book with a vision of hope for everyone, Sam ends his talk
with a call to reasonableness, and Krista ends her blog post with an
invitation to challenge ourselves. I'll quote her here:
No comments:
Post a Comment